Archive for January, 2007

h1

Return to the Serengeti (How not to go birding…)

January 30, 2007

Sorry to all for not posting everyday, or for every chapter in this book I’m reading. Some of the chapters I just can’t figure out what to comment on, plus they are short and I’m really having trouble stopping, I just want to keep at the book because it is so interesting.

One of the fascinating things about reading Roger Tory Peterson’s book “All Things Reconsidered” is the anecdotes he recalls while describing a comparatively pedestrian outing, in this case a carefully guided birding tour of the Serengeti in 1986.

He tells the story of Leslie Brown who in 1954 decides to explore a dry lake bed on foot in search of the breeding grounds of East African flamingos.

“Lake Natron, lying in an alkaline sink of the Great Rift, is about forty-five miles long and twenty miles across. It looks rather like a moonscape, or a scene out of Hell, with four or five pools of open water surrounded by miles of crystalline soda that appears a coconut-icing pink from a distance. Mirages shimmer in the stupefying heat. …

…he had walked a little way out onto the white soda that lined the shore; it was hard and firm – an aircraft could have landed on it. It stretched away, glittering in the sun with blinding whiteness. With the reflected heat striking him in the face, he walked out over the hard soda until it began to give way to pink, slushy water. Although he had gum boots, he tried a pair of mud boards, but because of the viscous mess he found them too difficult to use. He discarded them.

The soda crust was overlaid by a thin layer of pink stinking water, already hot from the sun and scumming with dead locusts that had flown into it. He began to crack through the crust, which grew thinner as the water deepened, and each of his footsteps was marked by a foul-smelling black patch. He crossed the slushy water to a soda flat that looked firmer. It was not flat and hard as was that near shore but had formed polygonal plates with raised edges rather like giant water lily leaves. They had weak spots where he broke through to the mud beneath.

Panting and gasping with the effort, he floundered on and on until he cracked through with both feet. Crawling out on hands and knees, he reeled with fatigue. His gum boots were full of chunks of crystalline soda that were cutting his feet. It was hopeless. Far more exhausted than he knew, he had to retrace the same ground in the hottest hours of the day, and without any spare water. When, after an agonizing struggle, he regained the hard soda, he sat down, took off his gum boots, and had a look at his feet. They gave him an upleasant shock. They were covered with enormous, bright red blood blisters, which, exposed to the air, slowly turned brown, then black.

A seven mile walk over the lava rubble brought him back to camp, where he lay down in a cool stream rushing down the mountainside. He sucked in the fresh water by the gallon while little fish nibbled at his blisters. But he didn’t care.

Next morning, with intense burning pain in his feet, which had turned septic, he faced a forty-five mile drive to Magadi along a rough and twisted track. At Magadi he languished for ten days in the hospital of the soda company, with his feet in bandages. They did not have to be cut off as he had feared, but in the end he had to have skin grafts.”

What I find amazing is that Leslie Brown did this trek alone, with no water, and no real plan. The only excuse I can see for this lack of judgement is the fact the dry lake is at 9,653 feet and he may have been suffering from impared judgement due to lack of oxygen. Combine that with tremendous heat and no water, I could see his judgement could have faltered.

Moral: Be safe when you bird, your trek isn’t always a picnic on the front lawn with pink flamingos.

h1

I’m moving my blog, to here…

January 26, 2007

January 26th, 2007

I wasn’t getting many comments over on the Myspace location, so I have copied all the old posts to this site on WordPress.  You can comment here without being a member, so please reread the old posts and feel free to comment on the old entries.  Sorry, the few comments from the old site weren’t copied, but feel free to recomment as you see fit. I’m leaving the old blog up on the old location, but I won’t be posting anything new there.

I’ll be putting up something new on this location very soon.

Regards,

Glenn Nevill

h1

Return to Kenya

January 26, 2007

 January 23, 2007

There is a chapter in the book about Peterson’s return to Kenya and the birds he found there.  Very fascinating reading, and I will not bore you with the list of birds he saw, plus his descriptions are much better than mine, though I am not going to do large pull quotes for you.  I recommend buying the book, or if your library has it, then check it out for yourself.

The sentence that caught my eye in this chapter is simply this one:

“I am not an obsessed lister; but bird photography is my therapy, and I would rather shoot a roll of film on some relatively common species than add a new bird to my life list.”

After thinking about this for a few days, I think he speaks for me too.  Photographing birds is my therapy too.

What’s yours.

Good birding,
Glenn

h1

Return to The Pribilofs

January 26, 2007

January 22, 2007

All Things Reconsidered

 

In 1953, Roger Tory Peterson paid a visit to the Pribilofs, a small chain of islands in the Bering Sea to document the wildlife there. He filmed 300,000 murres nesting and tufted puffins, auklets, snow buntings, lapland longspurs etc. He also documented the recovering fur seal population there. In 1983, he returned and found quite a reduced number of all these creatures. And so here is the concluding paragraphs written in 1984, (22 years before the movie Happy Feet came out with the same message.)

“But what has all this to do with birds? One cannot talk about the Pribilofs without bringing up fur seals. The survival problems of seas and seabirds are similar; both depend on fish. The deepwater gill nets of the commercial fishing fleets not only ensnare many seals but also drown untold numbers of seabirds. It has been estimated that gill nets of the Japanese North Pacific salmon fishery alone ensnare and drown 150,000 to 200,000 marine birds – mainly diving birds, such as murres and puffins – each year. A U.S. State Department environmental impact statement estimates that, overall, the Japanese kill about 1 million seabirds annually in their efficient purse seine nets and trawler gill nets. The murres and some of the other cliff nesters lay but a single egg and have a low reproductive potential. They cannot sustain this continued drain.”

“In a recent letter, Bill Rodstrom informed me that this year was the poorest yet for nesting success on St. Paul. Fewer than 10 percent of the black-legged and red-legged kittiwake nests still had live young at the end of the season. Red-faced cormorants also had a dismal year. Murres did somewhat better, although there were more dead chicks than he had seen in the past. Is overfishing affecting this food supply?
Add to these woes the constant threat of spills in these oil-exploited seas and the future looks bleak. We may never again see the numbers of birds that crowded the cliffs when Fisher and I made our 1953 visit.”
So 22 years ago, the problem of overfishing was know and published, and yet it is only in January of this year that something seems to be happening, at least in our government. An Oceans Protection Bill was introduced on Jan. 4th by the new Democratic Congress Read Here Also in Great Brittain here
Then of course there are problems with plastics polluting our oceans and killing birds, fish and sea mamals Marine Debris Abatement

Oh and of course there is the global warming problem and what it will do to the coast line should the ice melt on Antarctica…

Here’s what San Francisco will look like if the sea level rises by 100 feet:

I created this chart using some software called Vertical Mapper, you can see the posting online here.

Looks like we have a lot of work to do…

h1

What are you really?

January 26, 2007

 Friday January 19th, 2007

So the second essay in this book talks about what kind of bird watcher are you.

Anyway here are the categories Roger mentions in the 2nd article:
Ornithologist
Ornithophile
Bird Watcher
Birder
Bird Bander
Bird Fancier
Bird Spotter
Ticker
Lister
Twitcher

I consider myself a bird watcher.

So which are You?

If anyone wants to know what these categories mean then some one has to comment  with a question.  I’m not going write anymore on this subject for now till I have some feedback.

I just say that of all the categories, ticker is one of the strangest I have heard of.